Best Pinterest scrapers on Apify: Actors ranked by fields and price

The catalogue Actors for Pinterest data ranked by one published formula: core-field coverage, price per 1,000 results, reliability and freshness, with the official route beside them.

Short answer

The highest published score for Pinterest goes to Pinterest Scraper by epctex (96 of 100), a Store tool from another publisher, listed for reference. Among catalogue Actors, Pinterest Pins, Profiles, Boards & Idea Topics Scraper scores highest (82).

Ranked by the published formula, applied identically to every tool. Data checked 2026-11-12.

Pinterest scrapers

Ranked by target fit, published field coverage, price per 1,000, 30-day success rate, adoption and freshness. Every tool gets the same formula; missing values get fixed, published priors. The scores match the Pinterest page. Read the method.

Catalogue Actors for Pinterest, ranked
Sample fields
82 pinId, title, description 28 $0.99 12 runs, too few to rate Nov 2026
82 id, title, description 45 $0.99 6 runs, too few to rate Nov 2026
82
Pinterest Rich Pin, Board & Creator Field Scraper Catalogue Actor, pay per event
id, title, description 56 $0.99 no public runs Nov 2026
69
Pinterest Pin Comments & Activity Extractor Catalogue Actor, pay per event
pinId, title, activityType 13 $0.99 6 runs, too few to rate Nov 2026
65
Pinterest Media Downloader Catalogue Actor, pay per event
pin_id, pinterest_url, media_url 16 $0.99 6 runs, too few to rate Nov 2026
65 title, term, name 9 $0.99 13 runs, too few to rate Oct 2026

Other Store tools, for reference

Same formula, listed for comparison only; this site does not link or recommend them.

Other Store tools for Pinterest, for reference
Sample fields
96
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by epctex
id, grid_title, description 12 $0.10 100% of 371,227 runs Nov 2026
85
Pinterest Pins Scraper Reference only, by cirkit
id, title, description 25 $2.00 100% of 1,571 runs Oct 2026
79
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by silentflow
id, title, description 39 $2.00 100% of 24,515 runs Nov 2026
77
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by afanasenko
pin_id, title, description 74 $3.50 100% of 21,054 runs Nov 2026
75
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by memo23
title, description, link 9 $2.50 99% of 2,057 runs Nov 2026
75
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by automation-lab
title, description, url 29 $3.45 97% of 10,709 runs Nov 2026
73
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by dltik
pin_id, title, image_url 12 $2.00 100% of 6,494 runs Oct 2026
71
Pinterest Scraper Reference only, by bovi
title, link, board_name 10 $2.89 99% of 207 runs Nov 2026

Facts behind the list

FactValue
Core fields comparedpin_id, title, description, image_url, board, created_at, url
Official routePinterest API v5 (Public API)
Official priceNo published per-call price for standard API access
Ranking methodOne published formula for every tool: fit, field coverage, price per 1,000, 30-day success rate, adoption and freshness

Keep pins and other records distinguishable

The leading entry lists recordType with pinId, sourceUrl, title and description. Preserve recordType when handling mixed output so that a board or profile record is interpreted correctly.

The filtered collector lists sourceType and sourceValue, while the rich-pin scraper includes id, title and url. Compare the published schemas for source tracking and identifiers before choosing a common export format.

Choose media and activity outputs deliberately

Pinterest Media Downloader lists media_url and media_type alongside pin_id and pinterest_url. Inspect that entry when your output needs media references.

Pinterest Pin Comments & Activity Extractor lists activityType, commentId and isReply. Those distinctions matter when separating comments, replies and other activity in downstream analysis.

Use coverage to interpret the ranking

The listed Actors have the same advertised result price, while the ranking formula also weighs fit, core-field coverage, recent success rate, adoption and freshness. Compare the schema against your needs for pin identity, images, board context and creation time.

Pinterest offers a public API with no published per-call price for standard access. Consult the official documentation to compare its supported operations with the collection task you have chosen.

Questions people ask

Which Pinterest scraper leads the ranking?

Pinterest Pins, Profiles, Boards & Idea Topics Scraper ranks highest under the published formula. Its listed schema includes recordType, pinId, sourceUrl, title and description.

What should I compare for a pin catalogue?

Compare the leading scraper, the filtered collector and the rich-pin scraper against the information your catalogue requires. Check identifiers, image references, board context and timestamps in each published schema.

Which entry should I inspect for Pinterest media?

Pinterest Media Downloader is the media-focused entry in the ranking. Its published schema includes media_url and media_type, so review the Store listing for the media output your project needs.

Does Pinterest publish a standard API price per call?

Pinterest publishes no per-call price for standard API access. Review the official documentation for the operations and access requirements relevant to your project.

Sources

Every dated claim on this page comes from the public sources below. Check the source before you make a business decision on it.

Content updated 2026-11-12Data checked 2026-11-12

Get Pinterest data with a catalogue Actor

Pinterest Pins, Profiles, Boards & Idea Topics Scraper returns 7 of 7 core Pinterest fields at $0.99 per 1,000 results. Compare all 14 Pinterest routes.

Open in Apify Store